3%的疑問 - 考績

By Oliver
at 2010-03-04T23:17
at 2010-03-04T23:17
Table of Contents
我覺得有疑問的是,考績法真的照實打那麼:
(1)剛進的菜鳥跟快退休的老人考績明顯不如中間年資的人那要怎麼打?
(2) 私人公司的績效是以為公司賺多少錢來做評比,那公部門呢?
(3)假設有公務員剛正不阿不收民眾賄絡,結果被打丙會不會發生?
如果配套措施都沒有出來就急著要有政績,只會有反效果吧!
--
(1)剛進的菜鳥跟快退休的老人考績明顯不如中間年資的人那要怎麼打?
(2) 私人公司的績效是以為公司賺多少錢來做評比,那公部門呢?
(3)假設有公務員剛正不阿不收民眾賄絡,結果被打丙會不會發生?
如果配套措施都沒有出來就急著要有政績,只會有反效果吧!
--
Tags:
考績
All Comments

By Daniel
at 2010-03-05T18:11
at 2010-03-05T18:11

By Jessica
at 2010-03-06T08:35
at 2010-03-06T08:35

By Tom
at 2010-03-07T04:35
at 2010-03-07T04:35

By Kyle
at 2010-03-11T16:28
at 2010-03-11T16:28
Related Posts
「公務人員考績法修正草案」公聽會

By Caitlin
at 2010-03-04T23:01
at 2010-03-04T23:01
3%的疑問

By David
at 2010-03-04T22:45
at 2010-03-04T22:45
「公務人員考績法修正草案」公聽會

By Dinah
at 2010-03-04T22:40
at 2010-03-04T22:40
請各位公務員捍衛自己的權利吧 !

By Michael
at 2010-03-04T22:36
at 2010-03-04T22:36
真的會過嗎?

By Odelette
at 2010-03-04T22:34
at 2010-03-04T22:34