公務員考績法/張哲琛:堅持丙等3%下限 - 考績
By Bennie
at 2010-03-18T23:41
at 2010-03-18T23:41
Table of Contents
說句老實話,我待過的機關絕對都有超過3%應該打包走人的,
但我覺得強制以固定比例打丙是很有問題的,取而代之的應
是以正面表列具體而明確規範符合那些情形就應該吃丙,意
即完全排除人為的判斷因素,而完全以符合相關事實為認定
標準,而在乙以上才納入打考績者之評量才是正途啊..
--
但我覺得強制以固定比例打丙是很有問題的,取而代之的應
是以正面表列具體而明確規範符合那些情形就應該吃丙,意
即完全排除人為的判斷因素,而完全以符合相關事實為認定
標準,而在乙以上才納入打考績者之評量才是正途啊..
--
Tags:
考績
All Comments
By Ula
at 2010-03-22T20:42
at 2010-03-22T20:42
By Ula
at 2010-03-23T11:55
at 2010-03-23T11:55
By Rae
at 2010-03-24T23:33
at 2010-03-24T23:33
By Wallis
at 2010-03-25T17:37
at 2010-03-25T17:37
By Delia
at 2010-03-26T08:56
at 2010-03-26T08:56
By Frederic
at 2010-03-30T21:13
at 2010-03-30T21:13
By Charlie
at 2010-04-04T04:46
at 2010-04-04T04:46
By George
at 2010-04-04T10:04
at 2010-04-04T10:04
By Carol
at 2010-04-05T07:37
at 2010-04-05T07:37
Related Posts
台灣編年史 第九十九章第三節 -- 烤雞之亂
By Olivia
at 2010-03-18T23:00
at 2010-03-18T23:00
Re: 給總統一封信 公務員號召轉寄
By Edward Lewis
at 2010-03-18T22:33
at 2010-03-18T22:33
新考績法丙等3%之下 台鐵佐級VS中油雇員的選擇
By Hardy
at 2010-03-18T22:11
at 2010-03-18T22:11
公務員考績法/張哲琛:堅持丙等3%下限
By Mary
at 2010-03-18T21:30
at 2010-03-18T21:30
把高官加薪(高階文官團)拉進來打
By Jack
at 2010-03-18T21:11
at 2010-03-18T21:11