司法官適用丙等3% 司院法部反對 - 考試
By Ophelia
at 2010-04-01T20:54
at 2010-04-01T20:54
Table of Contents
(中央社記者安芷嫻台北1 日電)考試院會
今天通過公務人員考績法修正草案,並將司法
官列入「丙等3%」評鑑。司法院、法務部今天
同表反對,認為司法官與一般公務員性質不同
,不應以相同規範強制比率考核。
考試院會上午審查通過公務人員考績法修正
草案,明定各機關考績列丙等的人數比率不得
低於3%,而公務人員只要在10年內拿到3 次丙
等,又無後功抵銷先前丙等紀錄,即須辦理資
遣或退休;至於司法官部分,則同樣有丙等3%
規定,但不須強制資遣或退休。
司法院對此發布新聞稿,明確對考試院草案
內容表示遺憾,認為法官代表國家獨立行使職權
,僅有適任與不適任之分,與一般公務人員屬性
有所不同;如適用行政機關體制下的考績評比,
明顯不適當。
司法院表示,先前已擬定法官法草案,對於司
法官的不適任情形,特別設計退場機制,予以規範
或淘汰;但在法官法制定完成前,司法官仍為公務
人員考績法適用對象,應特別考量。
法務部政務次長黃世銘指出,先前銓敘部所研擬的
草案版本中,考量法官、檢察官等司法人員性質差
異,將其排除在公務員強制考列丙等制度之外,建
議日後立法院審議考試院版公務人員考績法修正草
案時,能作適當修正。990401
網址:http://0rz.tw/qxfUO
心得: 之前司法院不幫忙反對,果然現在連司法院
也納入丙等3%範圍了,這樣也好,改天釋憲時,再
請法官們高抬貴手了。
PS:下一個3%的對象是誰? 老師? 軍人? 等著看吧
--
All Comments
By Una
at 2010-04-05T11:04
at 2010-04-05T11:04
By Donna
at 2010-04-08T16:12
at 2010-04-08T16:12
By Edwina
at 2010-04-09T07:30
at 2010-04-09T07:30
By Olga
at 2010-04-12T17:46
at 2010-04-12T17:46
By Bethany
at 2010-04-16T09:32
at 2010-04-16T09:32
By Bethany
at 2010-04-18T00:38
at 2010-04-18T00:38
By Elizabeth
at 2010-04-22T11:02
at 2010-04-22T11:02
By Madame
at 2010-04-26T18:44
at 2010-04-26T18:44
By Ingrid
at 2010-05-01T14:41
at 2010-05-01T14:41
By Rosalind
at 2010-05-02T04:22
at 2010-05-02T04:22
By Charlie
at 2010-05-05T15:32
at 2010-05-05T15:32
By Daniel
at 2010-05-07T04:54
at 2010-05-07T04:54
By Vanessa
at 2010-05-11T08:47
at 2010-05-11T08:47
By Liam
at 2010-05-13T13:38
at 2010-05-13T13:38
By Gilbert
at 2010-05-17T11:54
at 2010-05-17T11:54
By Kelly
at 2010-05-21T23:54
at 2010-05-21T23:54
By Audriana
at 2010-05-25T19:13
at 2010-05-25T19:13
Related Posts
一定要提出自己版本的考績法
By Kelly
at 2010-04-01T20:13
at 2010-04-01T20:13
Re: 〈快訊〉關中拍板!性騷擾、遭判刑 一律打丙等
By Frederic
at 2010-04-01T19:57
at 2010-04-01T19:57
初考放榜了,如果考上考試院,要不要去報到?
By Ivy
at 2010-04-01T19:56
at 2010-04-01T19:56
Re: 如果當兵也丙等3%,由班長打考績,誰會吃丙?
By Selena
at 2010-04-01T19:43
at 2010-04-01T19:43
Re: 〈快訊〉關中拍板!性騷擾、遭判刑 一律打丙等
By Hamiltion
at 2010-04-01T19:17
at 2010-04-01T19:17