抗議台北市疑義答覆草率 - 教師
![Iris avatar](/img/girl5.jpg)
By Iris
at 2012-06-22T00:41
at 2012-06-22T00:41
Table of Contents
跟同樣在考試的朋友聊天,
對於台北市的輕率真的很生氣,
如果只打算用「維持原答案」五個字回應大家,
當初何必鼓勵大家疑義!
然後考生們用心的找出明確的出處做為證據來支持自己選的答案,
結果得到簡單五個字。
審查疑義的老師們真的有重新審查嗎?他們的答案依據又是什麼?
那為什麼同樣是專書,會有不同的答案?下次同樣的題目,又要怎麼作答?
這些都是問題。
或許有些人覺得,老問題了沒什麼好說的,
但我覺得可惡的不是無法為自己凹到分數,
而是審查疑義的老師及負責單位的草率跟不專業!
我們是未來的準教師!
理當有責任捍衛正確和應該做的事情的權利!
否則怎麼以身作則教育孩子何謂「做對的事情」!?
這不是胡亂吵鬧,而是理性的表達合理的訴求。
一人一通電話到教育局,絕對不花太多時間跟電話費。
以上。
各位考生這星期請繼續加油!!
預祝:金榜題名!!!!!
臺北市民當家熱線 1999( 外縣市請撥 02-27208889 )
--
Tags:
教師
All Comments
![Ingrid avatar](/img/woman.jpg)
By Ingrid
at 2012-06-26T04:33
at 2012-06-26T04:33
![Regina avatar](/img/woman-biz.jpg)
By Regina
at 2012-06-26T18:44
at 2012-06-26T18:44
![Mary avatar](/img/woman-glasses.jpg)
By Mary
at 2012-06-27T12:39
at 2012-06-27T12:39
![Valerie avatar](/img/woman-ring.jpg)
By Valerie
at 2012-06-27T21:27
at 2012-06-27T21:27
![Heather avatar](/img/cat1.jpg)
By Heather
at 2012-06-29T22:09
at 2012-06-29T22:09
![Steve avatar](/img/dog2.jpg)
By Steve
at 2012-07-01T09:42
at 2012-07-01T09:42
![Caroline avatar](/img/cat2.jpg)
By Caroline
at 2012-07-02T21:48
at 2012-07-02T21:48
![Edith avatar](/img/cat3.jpg)
By Edith
at 2012-07-03T08:55
at 2012-07-03T08:55
Related Posts
101年花蓮初試更換地點
![Linda avatar](/img/cat3.jpg)
By Linda
at 2012-06-19T21:17
at 2012-06-19T21:17
高雄呢....囧
![Skylar DavisLinda avatar](/img/boy1.jpg)
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2012-06-18T23:53
at 2012-06-18T23:53
台南的教甄報名進不去
![George avatar](/img/dog2.jpg)
By George
at 2012-06-18T22:09
at 2012-06-18T22:09
101北市教專第34題:認知發展
![Hardy avatar](/img/cat1.jpg)
By Hardy
at 2012-06-18T20:11
at 2012-06-18T20:11
101學年度臺中市教甄缺額
![Eden avatar](/img/bee.jpg)
By Eden
at 2012-06-18T19:57
at 2012-06-18T19:57