深度論述? - 考績
By Franklin
at 2010-03-24T21:46
at 2010-03-24T21:46
Table of Contents
看到現在,關於考績法的論述不外如下
(1) 民選首長整肅
(2) 民營企業都 5趴 , 沒有道理公家辦不到
============================================================
請問一下,
到目前為止,
有沒有投書 提到
(1) 政府 VS 企業 (2) 公共利益 (3) 公共政策 (4) 明諾布魯克宣言 AND 黑保宣言
這方面完整的論述?
如果沒有的話,
鄉親的思考真的很淺
這幾天,我也來構思一下,
真的看不下去了,
那些公共行政的老師, 真的不是一個爛字可以形容了,
完全沒有聲音,甚至是贊成
反倒是社會學系的老師,從社會學的觀點反對(我忘了他的名字,
前幾天中時有)
--
Tags:
考績
All Comments
By Selena
at 2010-03-26T15:17
at 2010-03-26T15:17
By Jake
at 2010-03-29T11:35
at 2010-03-29T11:35
By Valerie
at 2010-03-31T17:08
at 2010-03-31T17:08
By Ina
at 2010-04-03T00:56
at 2010-04-03T00:56
By Joseph
at 2010-04-07T23:20
at 2010-04-07T23:20
By Elizabeth
at 2010-04-09T11:05
at 2010-04-09T11:05
By Anthony
at 2010-04-12T13:27
at 2010-04-12T13:27
By Kyle
at 2010-04-12T21:15
at 2010-04-12T21:15
By Ivy
at 2010-04-14T22:47
at 2010-04-14T22:47
By Hedy
at 2010-04-18T11:05
at 2010-04-18T11:05
By Eden
at 2010-04-19T03:46
at 2010-04-19T03:46
By Agatha
at 2010-04-23T11:43
at 2010-04-23T11:43
By Ethan
at 2010-04-24T06:37
at 2010-04-24T06:37
By Tristan Cohan
at 2010-04-27T11:56
at 2010-04-27T11:56
By Lucy
at 2010-04-27T13:24
at 2010-04-27T13:24
By Tracy
at 2010-04-29T08:10
at 2010-04-29T08:10
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-05-01T07:38
at 2010-05-01T07:38
By Catherine
at 2010-05-01T21:30
at 2010-05-01T21:30
By Lily
at 2010-05-05T03:20
at 2010-05-05T03:20
By Olivia
at 2010-05-09T13:03
at 2010-05-09T13:03
By Queena
at 2010-05-14T08:26
at 2010-05-14T08:26
By Daniel
at 2010-05-14T23:04
at 2010-05-14T23:04
By Lucy
at 2010-05-18T09:19
at 2010-05-18T09:19
Related Posts
體委會澄清 蕭松彩解職無關人事
By Ethan
at 2010-03-24T20:34
at 2010-03-24T20:34
發聲管道!! 大家請多多反應!!
By Skylar Davis
at 2010-03-24T20:33
at 2010-03-24T20:33
台北市施政滿意度低 都是公務人員的錯??
By Margaret
at 2010-03-24T20:31
at 2010-03-24T20:31
台北市施政滿意度低 都是公務人員的錯??
By Doris
at 2010-03-24T19:59
at 2010-03-24T19:59
連勝文：3%淘汰率？應該訂20%才對！
By Leila
at 2010-03-24T19:52
at 2010-03-24T19:52