考績丙等3%復活 關中力挺改革 - 考試

By George
at 2012-09-03T17:29
at 2012-09-03T17:29
Table of Contents
來源: http://news.msn.com.tw/news2805596.aspx
中國時報【陳文信/台北報導】
為落實公務員考績制度,考試院前年提案修法,規定政府機關至少要將三%公務員的考績
打為丙等,但隨即引起基層公務員反彈,法案在立法院也因爭議不斷而胎死腹中。事隔兩
年捲土重來,銓敘部本月底將再提案送考試院會;考試院長關中昨說,「不達目的,誓不
終止」,表達力挺改革的決心。
考試院二○一○年提出攸關卅萬公務人員的《公務人員考績法》修正草案,為公務人員考
績丙等增設三%下限;不料,立法院完成初審後,引發反彈,即便立法、考試兩院分別提
出「一至三%」或「試辦一%」的折衷方案,仍難化解爭議,全案最後在五都選前「喊卡
」。
考試院近來重啟爐灶。銓敘部長張哲琛昨天與關中出席學術活動時指出,現行《考績法》
雖已有丙等的規定,但過去拿丙的公務員每年比率都在○.三%以下,形同虛設;為避免
考績流於形式,丙等一定要訂比例制,修法草案九月底將送考試院會,接著送立院審議,
盼列為立院新會期優先法案。
張哲琛表示,銓敘部草案版本為「丙等不得低於三%,十年內三次丙等就資遣或退休,但
後功可抵前過」,並有五個配套子法。有鑑於前年的反彈聲浪不小,他表示,銓敘部已在
全國辦過廿場說明會,雖仍有少數反彈,但大部分公務員都能理性看待。
關中則表示,公務員經激烈考試進入公務體系,必須有套制度,讓貢獻愈多的人,得到愈
大獎勵,「考績不落實,其他都是假的!」他說,過去立法推動過程被指有政治考量,但
若事事都為選舉考慮,那麼什麼事都不能做了,少數反對的人聲音很大,但他「不達目的
,誓不終止」。
關中指出,反對者擔心萬一打丙,一年努力落空,不但沒考績獎金,連工作獎金也沒有;
考試院瞭解此關鍵問題,因此將把考績獎金與工作獎金脫勾,保留工作獎金,就像在公、
私營企業工作一年後,都有年終工作獎金。至於考績獎金,關中說,這不是一種權利,而
是根據個人工作成績所得。
--
中國時報【陳文信/台北報導】
為落實公務員考績制度,考試院前年提案修法,規定政府機關至少要將三%公務員的考績
打為丙等,但隨即引起基層公務員反彈,法案在立法院也因爭議不斷而胎死腹中。事隔兩
年捲土重來,銓敘部本月底將再提案送考試院會;考試院長關中昨說,「不達目的,誓不
終止」,表達力挺改革的決心。
考試院二○一○年提出攸關卅萬公務人員的《公務人員考績法》修正草案,為公務人員考
績丙等增設三%下限;不料,立法院完成初審後,引發反彈,即便立法、考試兩院分別提
出「一至三%」或「試辦一%」的折衷方案,仍難化解爭議,全案最後在五都選前「喊卡
」。
考試院近來重啟爐灶。銓敘部長張哲琛昨天與關中出席學術活動時指出,現行《考績法》
雖已有丙等的規定,但過去拿丙的公務員每年比率都在○.三%以下,形同虛設;為避免
考績流於形式,丙等一定要訂比例制,修法草案九月底將送考試院會,接著送立院審議,
盼列為立院新會期優先法案。
張哲琛表示,銓敘部草案版本為「丙等不得低於三%,十年內三次丙等就資遣或退休,但
後功可抵前過」,並有五個配套子法。有鑑於前年的反彈聲浪不小,他表示,銓敘部已在
全國辦過廿場說明會,雖仍有少數反彈,但大部分公務員都能理性看待。
關中則表示,公務員經激烈考試進入公務體系,必須有套制度,讓貢獻愈多的人,得到愈
大獎勵,「考績不落實,其他都是假的!」他說,過去立法推動過程被指有政治考量,但
若事事都為選舉考慮,那麼什麼事都不能做了,少數反對的人聲音很大,但他「不達目的
,誓不終止」。
關中指出,反對者擔心萬一打丙,一年努力落空,不但沒考績獎金,連工作獎金也沒有;
考試院瞭解此關鍵問題,因此將把考績獎金與工作獎金脫勾,保留工作獎金,就像在公、
私營企業工作一年後,都有年終工作獎金。至於考績獎金,關中說,這不是一種權利,而
是根據個人工作成績所得。
--
All Comments

By Zenobia
at 2012-09-05T03:29
at 2012-09-05T03:29

By Blanche
at 2012-09-09T05:28
at 2012-09-09T05:28

By Hedda
at 2012-09-10T18:33
at 2012-09-10T18:33

By Tracy
at 2012-09-12T12:43
at 2012-09-12T12:43

By Kumar
at 2012-09-16T12:34
at 2012-09-16T12:34

By Robert
at 2012-09-18T12:20
at 2012-09-18T12:20

By Yuri
at 2012-09-23T05:18
at 2012-09-23T05:18

By Charlotte
at 2012-09-23T10:24
at 2012-09-23T10:24

By Iris
at 2012-09-23T12:25
at 2012-09-23T12:25

By Megan
at 2012-09-27T13:29
at 2012-09-27T13:29

By Jacob
at 2012-10-01T09:39
at 2012-10-01T09:39

By Connor
at 2012-10-01T21:56
at 2012-10-01T21:56

By Andy
at 2012-10-01T23:52
at 2012-10-01T23:52

By Elizabeth
at 2012-10-06T09:54
at 2012-10-06T09:54

By Emily
at 2012-10-07T13:32
at 2012-10-07T13:32

By Yedda
at 2012-10-09T19:39
at 2012-10-09T19:39

By Anonymous
at 2012-10-11T05:02
at 2012-10-11T05:02

By Franklin
at 2012-10-11T06:30
at 2012-10-11T06:30

By Olivia
at 2012-10-13T04:34
at 2012-10-13T04:34

By Valerie
at 2012-10-16T23:52
at 2012-10-16T23:52

By John
at 2012-10-19T12:01
at 2012-10-19T12:01

By Oliver
at 2012-10-21T02:16
at 2012-10-21T02:16

By Noah
at 2012-10-23T09:33
at 2012-10-23T09:33

By Elvira
at 2012-10-27T04:07
at 2012-10-27T04:07

By Mia
at 2012-10-28T05:11
at 2012-10-28T05:11

By Quintina
at 2012-11-01T09:19
at 2012-11-01T09:19
主要原因吧 = =+

By Mia
at 2012-11-01T13:44
at 2012-11-01T13:44

By Enid
at 2012-11-02T09:55
at 2012-11-02T09:55

By Delia
at 2012-11-03T15:09
at 2012-11-03T15:09

By Xanthe
at 2012-11-07T02:14
at 2012-11-07T02:14

By Andrew
at 2012-11-08T11:59
at 2012-11-08T11:59

By Lydia
at 2012-11-10T11:13
at 2012-11-10T11:13

By Belly
at 2012-11-10T23:22
at 2012-11-10T23:22

By Sandy
at 2012-11-13T17:32
at 2012-11-13T17:32

By Bennie
at 2012-11-18T06:48
at 2012-11-18T06:48

By Lily
at 2012-11-21T22:13
at 2012-11-21T22:13

By Ivy
at 2012-11-23T16:22
at 2012-11-23T16:22

By Hardy
at 2012-11-24T02:55
at 2012-11-24T02:55

By Edward Lewis
at 2012-11-24T22:02
at 2012-11-24T22:02

By Cara
at 2012-11-28T12:37
at 2012-11-28T12:37
何改革精神衝突

By Ursula
at 2012-12-01T11:44
at 2012-12-01T11:44

By Tom
at 2012-12-02T00:51
at 2012-12-02T00:51

By Sierra Rose
at 2012-12-03T07:57
at 2012-12-03T07:57

By Christine
at 2012-12-06T14:47
at 2012-12-06T14:47

By Ivy
at 2012-12-08T02:27
at 2012-12-08T02:27

By Linda
at 2012-12-08T08:42
at 2012-12-08T08:42

By Elizabeth
at 2012-12-09T22:35
at 2012-12-09T22:35

By Ingrid
at 2012-12-11T21:35
at 2012-12-11T21:35

By Mary
at 2012-12-15T21:04
at 2012-12-15T21:04

By Ida
at 2012-12-18T11:08
at 2012-12-18T11:08

By Emily
at 2012-12-23T06:29
at 2012-12-23T06:29

By Dorothy
at 2012-12-25T18:19
at 2012-12-25T18:19

By Regina
at 2012-12-25T23:04
at 2012-12-25T23:04

By Brianna
at 2012-12-30T04:13
at 2012-12-30T04:13

By Zanna
at 2012-12-30T18:27
at 2012-12-30T18:27

By Brianna
at 2013-01-01T17:43
at 2013-01-01T17:43
打丙的對象,怎麼還有人搞不清楚狀況????

By Emma
at 2013-01-04T13:13
at 2013-01-04T13:13

By Zanna
at 2013-01-07T14:53
at 2013-01-07T14:53

By Kyle
at 2013-01-12T01:51
at 2013-01-12T01:51

By Ivy
at 2013-01-14T22:53
at 2013-01-14T22:53

By Sandy
at 2013-01-15T01:28
at 2013-01-15T01:28
題"的銓敘部長官一樣

By Zenobia
at 2013-01-19T18:41
at 2013-01-19T18:41

By David
at 2013-01-23T17:24
at 2013-01-23T17:24

By Elizabeth
at 2013-01-25T13:26
at 2013-01-25T13:26

By Gilbert
at 2013-01-28T02:41
at 2013-01-28T02:41

By Ursula
at 2013-01-28T06:21
at 2013-01-28T06:21

By Caitlin
at 2013-01-28T12:30
at 2013-01-28T12:30

By Zenobia
at 2013-02-01T19:44
at 2013-02-01T19:44

By Rebecca
at 2013-02-06T12:56
at 2013-02-06T12:56

By Callum
at 2013-02-09T06:31
at 2013-02-09T06:31

By Genevieve
at 2013-02-11T18:18
at 2013-02-11T18:18

By Jacky
at 2013-02-16T00:14
at 2013-02-16T00:14

By Bethany
at 2013-02-16T04:35
at 2013-02-16T04:35

By Megan
at 2013-02-20T20:27
at 2013-02-20T20:27

By Charlie
at 2013-02-22T00:23
at 2013-02-22T00:23

By Donna
at 2013-02-25T14:50
at 2013-02-25T14:50

By Emily
at 2013-02-27T06:52
at 2013-02-27T06:52

By Faithe
at 2013-02-27T16:29
at 2013-02-27T16:29

By Olga
at 2013-03-01T15:15
at 2013-03-01T15:15

By Carolina Franco
at 2013-03-04T02:08
at 2013-03-04T02:08

By Frederic
at 2013-03-04T23:49
at 2013-03-04T23:49
如果是法定事由而打丙 那還可以接受...

By Lydia
at 2013-03-09T05:29
at 2013-03-09T05:29

By Hedwig
at 2013-03-13T13:48
at 2013-03-13T13:48

By Mason
at 2013-03-15T22:22
at 2013-03-15T22:22

By Joseph
at 2013-03-20T14:01
at 2013-03-20T14:01

By Aaliyah
at 2013-03-24T06:49
at 2013-03-24T06:49

By Blanche
at 2013-03-29T02:35
at 2013-03-29T02:35

By Xanthe
at 2013-04-01T14:11
at 2013-04-01T14:11

By Oliver
at 2013-04-04T05:13
at 2013-04-04T05:13

By David
at 2013-04-04T16:06
at 2013-04-04T16:06

By Liam
at 2013-04-09T06:18
at 2013-04-09T06:18

By Edith
at 2013-04-10T14:02
at 2013-04-10T14:02

By Kristin
at 2013-04-12T06:07
at 2013-04-12T06:07
M型化

By Doris
at 2013-04-17T03:05
at 2013-04-17T03:05

By Lydia
at 2013-04-21T12:54
at 2013-04-21T12:54

By Enid
at 2013-04-22T14:52
at 2013-04-22T14:52

By Valerie
at 2013-04-25T09:25
at 2013-04-25T09:25

By Andrew
at 2013-04-25T13:28
at 2013-04-25T13:28

By Barb Cronin
at 2013-04-28T05:15
at 2013-04-28T05:15

By James
at 2013-04-30T20:49
at 2013-04-30T20:49

By Edward Lewis
at 2013-05-03T07:17
at 2013-05-03T07:17

By Bennie
at 2013-05-04T05:35
at 2013-05-04T05:35
這麼簡單的邏輯有啥好爭論的呢??

By Iris
at 2013-05-08T20:08
at 2013-05-08T20:08

By Poppy
at 2013-05-10T00:46
at 2013-05-10T00:46
只有高官可以打屬官的丙,請問誰打高官丙

By Annie
at 2013-05-14T23:45
at 2013-05-14T23:45

By Lily
at 2013-05-17T23:13
at 2013-05-17T23:13

By Dora
at 2013-05-20T16:35
at 2013-05-20T16:35

By Ophelia
at 2013-05-21T09:11
at 2013-05-21T09:11
就不怕底層反彈、抗爭。

By Bennie
at 2013-05-25T14:25
at 2013-05-25T14:25
是誰在打林考績的也可以順便下台

By Emily
at 2013-05-28T08:05
at 2013-05-28T08:05

By Valerie
at 2013-05-31T21:12
at 2013-05-31T21:12
Related Posts
盼列立院新會期優先法案 考績丙等3%復活 關中力挺改革

By Kyle
at 2012-09-03T12:58
at 2012-09-03T12:58
支持棺終的腦殘社論

By Jake
at 2012-09-03T10:23
at 2012-09-03T10:23
台灣最不缺的就是人才

By Ivy
at 2012-09-03T06:14
at 2012-09-03T06:14
商調問題

By Ingrid
at 2012-09-03T00:23
at 2012-09-03T00:23
德儀/研華/頂新康師傅/KLA/西門子

By Rae
at 2012-09-02T16:58
at 2012-09-02T16:58