考績改革 馬聲明挺試院 - 考試
By Emma
at 2010-03-22T06:51
at 2010-03-22T06:51
Table of Contents
考績改革 馬聲明挺試院
【聯合報╱記者陳洛薇、李光儀/台北報導】 2010.03.22 05:40 am
馬英九總統昨天罕見地發表聲明,力挺考試院改革現行考績制度。他提出改革三大方向:
建立相對客觀務實的考評標準、設立申訴管道與功過相抵機制、主管人員考評徇私不公應
受嚴厲懲處。
銓敘部長張哲琛表示,會遵照總統指示辦理。他強調,考績法修法有完整配套,若主管考
績不公,將被追究責任。
考績法修正草案引發公務員反彈,考試院、行政院也不同調。馬總統昨天呼籲社會各界正
面看待行政、考試兩院間的熱烈討論,政府決定公共政策前,各部門表達不同見解的討論
,可促使最大公約數的產生,使政策制定更成熟周延。但對於引發爭議的丙等百分之三比
率,聲明中並未觸及。
黨政人士表示,馬總統的聲明是對考績改革做出原則性的修法宣示,強調主管考評的責任
機制,不能讓優秀公務人員受到不公平考評。至於考試院堅持三趴丙等的基準值,各部門
可以有立場,但聽取各方意見後,透過討論凝聚共識,本是民主政治的過程。
馬總統指出,我國公務員大多素質良好、認真負責,也有極少數敷衍塞責、尸位素餐;目
前的績效考評方式,對優秀公務員未盡公平,對不適任公務員卻束手無策,改革不公平、
不合理的現狀,是推動新考績制度的重點,「在這一點上,兩院並無歧見」。
馬總統提出三大方向:第一,建立相對客觀、務實可行的考評標準,並減少當前輪流考列
某一等第的鄉愿作風;第二,建立通暢、獨立、公正的申訴管道與功過相抵機制,保障公
務員合法權益,並鼓勵改過自新;第三,主管人員若考評徇私不公,應受嚴厲懲處。
馬總統表示,考績法改革最重要目的,在於落實公平合理的績效考評,以獎優汰劣,提振
士氣,提高效能;落實主管人員公平考核的責任,是公務員最關心的,也是考績制度改革
成敗關鍵。
他強調,考績制度改革是要掃除公務部門勞逸不均、良莠不齊的現象,讓優秀認真公務員
得到應有獎勵,讓不適任公務員進步或淘汰,相信考試院定能周諮博採、集思廣益、斟酌
允當,使考績法修正案獲得公務員及立院支持通過。
http://udn.com/NEWS/NATIONAL/NAT3/5489528.shtml
--
哈哈哈咳咳咳,隨他去吧
--
All Comments
By Dora
at 2010-03-26T04:05
at 2010-03-26T04:05
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-03-27T23:48
at 2010-03-27T23:48
By Tristan Cohan
at 2010-03-29T02:27
at 2010-03-29T02:27
By Iris
at 2010-04-01T18:48
at 2010-04-01T18:48
By Zora
at 2010-04-06T04:05
at 2010-04-06T04:05
By James
at 2010-04-07T13:17
at 2010-04-07T13:17
By Liam
at 2010-04-10T17:05
at 2010-04-10T17:05
By Jack
at 2010-04-14T05:13
at 2010-04-14T05:13
By Emma
at 2010-04-18T10:39
at 2010-04-18T10:39
By James
at 2010-04-21T15:36
at 2010-04-21T15:36
By Wallis
at 2010-04-26T04:46
at 2010-04-26T04:46
By Susan
at 2010-04-28T04:56
at 2010-04-28T04:56
By Sandy
at 2010-05-01T15:59
at 2010-05-01T15:59
By Todd Johnson
at 2010-05-05T04:53
at 2010-05-05T04:53
By Catherine
at 2010-05-09T20:47
at 2010-05-09T20:47
By Thomas
at 2010-05-11T14:00
at 2010-05-11T14:00
By Belly
at 2010-05-12T01:49
at 2010-05-12T01:49
By Gary
at 2010-05-16T15:50
at 2010-05-16T15:50
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-05-21T10:25
at 2010-05-21T10:25
By Kyle
at 2010-05-24T06:13
at 2010-05-24T06:13
By Lily
at 2010-05-27T05:52
at 2010-05-27T05:52
By Edith
at 2010-05-31T09:42
at 2010-05-31T09:42
By Jacob
at 2010-06-04T14:54
at 2010-06-04T14:54
By Skylar Davis
at 2010-06-08T02:48
at 2010-06-08T02:48
By Daniel
at 2010-06-08T23:22
at 2010-06-08T23:22
By Agatha
at 2010-06-09T16:56
at 2010-06-09T16:56
By Jacob
at 2010-06-12T05:26
at 2010-06-12T05:26
By Faithe
at 2010-06-16T06:32
at 2010-06-16T06:32
By Michael
at 2010-06-18T21:07
at 2010-06-18T21:07
By Kama
at 2010-06-22T20:06
at 2010-06-22T20:06
By Joe
at 2010-06-25T22:23
at 2010-06-25T22:23
By George
at 2010-06-27T20:49
at 2010-06-27T20:49
By Daph Bay
at 2010-06-29T14:02
at 2010-06-29T14:02
By Oscar
at 2010-06-29T15:14
at 2010-06-29T15:14
Related Posts
考績法爭議/請考試院先試辦三年
By Lucy
at 2010-03-21T23:48
at 2010-03-21T23:48
請問考績法說明會的時間地點
By Frederic
at 2010-03-21T23:37
at 2010-03-21T23:37
公務員是哪裡得罪馬政府?
By Jacky
at 2010-03-21T23:24
at 2010-03-21T23:24
考績法修訂之後續探討
By Ingrid
at 2010-03-21T23:23
at 2010-03-21T23:23
考績法修訂之後續探討
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-03-21T22:50
at 2010-03-21T22:50