蘋果新聞 首例符合 勞退月領1.6萬 - 公職
By Elma
at 2017-07-10T22:35
at 2017-07-10T22:35
Table of Contents
這篇誤解了,這個勞工的投保年資40~45年左右。
20歲幹到60~65歲。
40年耶老師任職25年都嫌累了,勞工是要做到死喔?
公:5.6萬月退, 55歲起領
教:6.8萬月退, 53歲起領
勞:1.5萬月退, 65歲起領
退休金差了一千五百萬。年資這麼長,還被屌虐。
誰說勞退好的?
--
20歲幹到60~65歲。
40年耶老師任職25年都嫌累了,勞工是要做到死喔?
公:5.6萬月退, 55歲起領
教:6.8萬月退, 53歲起領
勞:1.5萬月退, 65歲起領
退休金差了一千五百萬。年資這麼長,還被屌虐。
誰說勞退好的?
--
Tags:
公職
All Comments
By Leila
at 2017-07-13T23:51
at 2017-07-13T23:51
By William
at 2017-07-18T01:32
at 2017-07-18T01:32
By Cara
at 2017-07-20T15:41
at 2017-07-20T15:41
By Zora
at 2017-07-23T01:57
at 2017-07-23T01:57
By Carol
at 2017-07-25T23:16
at 2017-07-25T23:16
By Carol
at 2017-07-28T15:52
at 2017-07-28T15:52
By Yedda
at 2017-07-29T19:36
at 2017-07-29T19:36
By Dinah
at 2017-08-02T17:34
at 2017-08-02T17:34
By Sandy
at 2017-08-04T12:30
at 2017-08-04T12:30
By Caroline
at 2017-08-06T01:21
at 2017-08-06T01:21
By William
at 2017-08-10T02:39
at 2017-08-10T02:39
By Leila
at 2017-08-11T14:18
at 2017-08-11T14:18
By Linda
at 2017-08-13T10:46
at 2017-08-13T10:46
By Kama
at 2017-08-17T09:38
at 2017-08-17T09:38
By Andrew
at 2017-08-20T01:48
at 2017-08-20T01:48
By Olive
at 2017-08-22T02:11
at 2017-08-22T02:11
By Annie
at 2017-08-26T14:36
at 2017-08-26T14:36
By Emma
at 2017-08-28T07:19
at 2017-08-28T07:19
By James
at 2017-08-29T01:15
at 2017-08-29T01:15
By Carolina Franco
at 2017-08-29T09:09
at 2017-08-29T09:09
By Heather
at 2017-08-30T20:12
at 2017-08-30T20:12
By Irma
at 2017-09-01T06:36
at 2017-09-01T06:36
By Necoo
at 2017-09-04T18:34
at 2017-09-04T18:34
By Rosalind
at 2017-09-06T20:36
at 2017-09-06T20:36
By Linda
at 2017-09-10T13:41
at 2017-09-10T13:41
By Aaliyah
at 2017-09-13T18:45
at 2017-09-13T18:45
By Carol
at 2017-09-14T20:16
at 2017-09-14T20:16
By Robert
at 2017-09-16T11:57
at 2017-09-16T11:57
By David
at 2017-09-21T07:57
at 2017-09-21T07:57
By Barb Cronin
at 2017-09-26T00:04
at 2017-09-26T00:04
By Thomas
at 2017-09-26T03:11
at 2017-09-26T03:11
By Doris
at 2017-09-28T18:31
at 2017-09-28T18:31
By Edith
at 2017-10-03T15:45
at 2017-10-03T15:45
By Doris
at 2017-10-04T04:03
at 2017-10-04T04:03
By Xanthe
at 2017-10-08T13:55
at 2017-10-08T13:55
By Ula
at 2017-10-10T11:35
at 2017-10-10T11:35
By Faithe
at 2017-10-11T22:08
at 2017-10-11T22:08
By Linda
at 2017-10-12T10:43
at 2017-10-12T10:43
By Michael
at 2017-10-15T03:35
at 2017-10-15T03:35
By Selena
at 2017-10-15T20:42
at 2017-10-15T20:42
By Gilbert
at 2017-10-20T16:34
at 2017-10-20T16:34
By Tom
at 2017-10-25T13:24
at 2017-10-25T13:24
By Ingrid
at 2017-10-25T14:53
at 2017-10-25T14:53
By Caitlin
at 2017-10-28T02:57
at 2017-10-28T02:57
By Rosalind
at 2017-10-30T21:12
at 2017-10-30T21:12
By Elvira
at 2017-11-03T03:14
at 2017-11-03T03:14
By John
at 2017-11-06T07:58
at 2017-11-06T07:58
By Edward Lewis
at 2017-11-07T17:33
at 2017-11-07T17:33
By Wallis
at 2017-11-08T10:24
at 2017-11-08T10:24
By Kelly
at 2017-11-11T11:01
at 2017-11-11T11:01
By Lauren
at 2017-11-13T07:06
at 2017-11-13T07:06
By Valerie
at 2017-11-17T15:03
at 2017-11-17T15:03
By Margaret
at 2017-11-21T14:36
at 2017-11-21T14:36
By Damian
at 2017-11-23T17:16
at 2017-11-23T17:16
By Hedy
at 2017-11-23T23:08
at 2017-11-23T23:08
By Belly
at 2017-11-28T18:54
at 2017-11-28T18:54
By Mary
at 2017-11-29T16:23
at 2017-11-29T16:23
By Christine
at 2017-11-30T12:44
at 2017-11-30T12:44
By Bennie
at 2017-12-01T15:19
at 2017-12-01T15:19
Related Posts
銓敘部解釋五年退職政府不想負責的謠言
By James
at 2017-07-10T22:16
at 2017-07-10T22:16
銓敘部解釋五年退職政府不想負責的謠言
By Necoo
at 2017-07-10T22:11
at 2017-07-10T22:11
銓敘部解釋五年退職政府不想負責的謠言
By Hedwig
at 2017-07-10T21:32
at 2017-07-10T21:32
銓敘部解釋五年退職政府不想負責的謠言
By Isla
at 2017-07-10T19:25
at 2017-07-10T19:25
警消年金不應比照公務員 親民黨搶先國民
By Kelly
at 2017-07-10T13:36
at 2017-07-10T13:36