銓敘部最新說明 - 考試
By George
at 2010-03-05T23:29
at 2010-03-05T23:29
Table of Contents
銓敘部近期將辦理二十場次考績法修正草案說明會
銓敘部擬具之公務人員考績法修正草案,於對外公開說明後,根據部分媒體所做民調及輿
情反映,絕大多數均表達支持及肯定的意見,顯示所擬考績改革的大方向是正確的,也同
時反映出民眾對國家整體行政績效的提昇是充滿熱切的期待。
對於近日部分媒體報導有學者及公務人員對考績改革所提一些不同意見,銓敘部表示,應
是不瞭解考績法修正草案整體之修正內容及改革用意所致,因此特別說明如下:
1.為什麼要訂定丙等比率部分:按績效表現是常模分布方式,有好就有壞,但在現行制度
下,因實務執行偏差與鄉愿文化,近年考列甲等及乙等人數比率高達99.7%以上,考列丙
等占不到0.2%,考列丁等趨近於零,造成公務人員予外界鐵飯碗的印象,是以,考績法研
修乃訂定丙等比率,而訂定比率的目的在找出績效差者,予以輔導改善,如輔導後仍未改
善,先予降級,第三次再考列丙等者始予資遣或退休,並非以淘汰為目的,而是希望能以
緩和漸進的改革方式,尋求共識,以達成全面改革的最終目標。
2.考核標準應防政治力介入部分:考績法及相關規定業就考績透明化、民主化、受考人救
濟保障、主管人員及辦理考績人員課責有所規範。至機關首長部分,考績法明定考績應以
受考人之工作績效、工作態度為考核因素,如機關首長對受考人考績之評價,係基於其他
因素考量而達其整肅異己之目的,顯已違反考績法規定,受考人因而提起考績救濟,經保
訓會本其權責查證屬實而撤銷原考績處分者,未來將協調保訓會將撤銷決定函送上級機關
,使上級機關對該機關首長究責。
3.優等獎金僅比甲等多出半個月,讓公務員覺得「誘因太少」部分:事實上本次考績法之
修正,係考量在不增加政府財政預算負擔及不增加人事費之前提下,除增列優等,而且各
等次考績獎金均以相差半個月額度設計外,因為考績結果係與公務人員考績升官職等、職
務陞遷、培訓拔擢等公務生涯發展相扣合,故考績等次之差異,並非僅限於考績獎金,配
合公務人員升官等條件及優先陞任條件之修正,實際上影響最大的是後續受考人的發展,
另已敘本俸最高級或已敘年功俸級考列乙等者,係以隔年晉敘方式予以規範,透過考績制
度之重行設計,合理分辨公務人員年度績效表現,也大幅拉大優劣的獎勵差異,以達成獎
勵績優人員之考績目的。
銓敘部並表示:為避免公務人員因不瞭解具體修正內容而感不安,或做不必要的揣測,該
部已規劃自本(99)年3月12日起至4月16日,在全國各縣市辦理20場次的宣導說明會,參
加對象包括人事主管人員、人事非主管人員、ㄧ般主管及ㄧ般人員等,公務人員如有不同
意見,屆時可於會中表達,銓?部會將各方意見陳供考試院院會審查考績法修正草案之參
考。
結論:銓敘部說來說去還是鬼打牆..倒是這20場宣導說明會大家也要去表達意見喔
我公聽會也一定會去..但是心裡有數就是了
--
--
All Comments
By Zenobia
at 2010-03-10T10:22
at 2010-03-10T10:22
By Faithe
at 2010-03-11T06:20
at 2010-03-11T06:20
By Gary
at 2010-03-13T20:44
at 2010-03-13T20:44
By Barb Cronin
at 2010-03-18T17:41
at 2010-03-18T17:41
By Necoo
at 2010-03-20T18:06
at 2010-03-20T18:06
By Kyle
at 2010-03-20T19:32
at 2010-03-20T19:32
By Elizabeth
at 2010-03-22T18:18
at 2010-03-22T18:18
By Caroline
at 2010-03-27T01:27
at 2010-03-27T01:27
By Gilbert
at 2010-03-29T08:31
at 2010-03-29T08:31
By Cara
at 2010-03-31T16:53
at 2010-03-31T16:53
By Freda
at 2010-04-04T03:13
at 2010-04-04T03:13
By Hedy
at 2010-04-06T06:38
at 2010-04-06T06:38
By Lily
at 2010-04-06T15:37
at 2010-04-06T15:37
By Ophelia
at 2010-04-08T07:47
at 2010-04-08T07:47
By Anonymous
at 2010-04-11T08:58
at 2010-04-11T08:58
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-04-12T19:04
at 2010-04-12T19:04
By Daniel
at 2010-04-17T06:59
at 2010-04-17T06:59
By Jake
at 2010-04-20T06:08
at 2010-04-20T06:08
By Sierra Rose
at 2010-04-22T10:02
at 2010-04-22T10:02
By Jacob
at 2010-04-24T22:52
at 2010-04-24T22:52
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-04-27T11:44
at 2010-04-27T11:44
By Elma
at 2010-04-28T08:00
at 2010-04-28T08:00
By Kelly
at 2010-04-28T09:23
at 2010-04-28T09:23
By Victoria
at 2010-04-30T17:01
at 2010-04-30T17:01
By Valerie
at 2010-05-04T17:57
at 2010-05-04T17:57
By Michael
at 2010-05-05T21:13
at 2010-05-05T21:13
By Emma
at 2010-05-07T06:22
at 2010-05-07T06:22
By Kumar
at 2010-05-09T11:33
at 2010-05-09T11:33
By Donna
at 2010-05-10T15:22
at 2010-05-10T15:22
By Linda
at 2010-05-15T12:20
at 2010-05-15T12:20
By Franklin
at 2010-05-19T05:23
at 2010-05-19T05:23
By Jack
at 2010-05-23T03:43
at 2010-05-23T03:43
By Daph Bay
at 2010-05-24T02:34
at 2010-05-24T02:34
By Harry
at 2010-05-28T15:05
at 2010-05-28T15:05
By Joseph
at 2010-05-30T02:38
at 2010-05-30T02:38
By Joseph
at 2010-06-02T18:06
at 2010-06-02T18:06
By Caitlin
at 2010-06-06T08:54
at 2010-06-06T08:54
Related Posts
考績惡法反映-立法院委員信箱留言版
By Regina
at 2010-03-05T23:10
at 2010-03-05T23:10
彰化市公所一員工考績吃丙提申訴
By Tracy
at 2010-03-05T22:58
at 2010-03-05T22:58
考績惡法反映-立法院委員信箱留言版
By Donna
at 2010-03-05T22:51
at 2010-03-05T22:51
惡法草案
By Agnes
at 2010-03-05T22:46
at 2010-03-05T22:46
關於考績法的反向思考
By Dinah
at 2010-03-05T22:43
at 2010-03-05T22:43