銓敘部澄清係主動向府院高層簡報考績法修正規劃方向及內容 - 考試
By Erin
at 2010-03-12T18:28
at 2010-03-12T18:28
Table of Contents
銓敘部表示:有關報載「修考績法惹反彈 馬總統邀兩院滅火」一事,完全與事實不符。為
研修考績法,該部歷時約1年時間蒐集國外考績制度,並舉辦11場次座談會,廣徵學者專
家、企業界及公務人員意見,另委託輔仁大學統計資訊學系辦理意見調查,以及參考試院
委託私立世新大學民意調查研究中心調查結果後,始擬具考績法修正草案,草案研擬後亦
再於98年12月3次邀集中央暨地方各主管機關人事機構及人事主管溝通,其後始於本(99
)年2月26日函報考試院審查中,修法過程審慎嚴謹,亦充分與公務人員溝通。且現正展
開20場次宣導說明會,向4,000位以上之中高階層代表,面對面進行意見交換。
銓敘部亦表示:本次考績法研修期間,考試院關院長均隨時向總統報告改革之精神與理念
,係為達成協助受考人與時俱進積極任事、提升行政機關組織效率與效能、強化政府執行
力與國家競爭力之預期目標,希望改革後贏得民眾重新肯定國家文官之價值。銓敘部並強
調,本次考績法係作全方位之改革,但部分媒體過度渲染報導丙等退場機制,造成公務人
員恐慌,為使總統瞭解考績法研修方向,該部乃主動要求向府院高層報告,因此,並無所
謂修考績法惹反彈,馬總統邀兩院滅火之情事。
感想:我真想罵髒話..有時候真希望乾脆廢除死刑算了..還蠻想第一個刺殺關x
反正也不用死.....什麼叫做媒體過度渲染?又什麼叫做與事實不符?老實
說根本沒媒體在渲染(大家還希望媒體把事情鬧大可是根本沒被注意)..
是真正的恐慌..我們基層的是真正的在反抗..銓敘部跟考試院根本就一整
個自我感覺良好..再者..向4000位以上中高階層代表面對面意見交換??是
商議如何輪流打丙等嬤??一看就知道玩陰的..看到公聽會很多人替我們基
曾發聲是如此的感動..但是還是無法抵擋銓敘部跟考試院的硬幹...這法如
果過了我終生不投國民黨!!
--
--
All Comments
By Todd Johnson
at 2010-03-15T03:28
at 2010-03-15T03:28
By Queena
at 2010-03-17T04:33
at 2010-03-17T04:33
By Harry
at 2010-03-21T09:03
at 2010-03-21T09:03
By Robert
at 2010-03-23T08:11
at 2010-03-23T08:11
By Caitlin
at 2010-03-25T19:46
at 2010-03-25T19:46
By Lydia
at 2010-03-30T10:36
at 2010-03-30T10:36
By Barb Cronin
at 2010-03-31T08:24
at 2010-03-31T08:24
By Frederic
at 2010-04-02T14:10
at 2010-04-02T14:10
By Ivy
at 2010-04-02T19:38
at 2010-04-02T19:38
By Regina
at 2010-04-05T13:32
at 2010-04-05T13:32
By Damian
at 2010-04-09T17:18
at 2010-04-09T17:18
By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2010-04-14T00:20
at 2010-04-14T00:20
By Margaret
at 2010-04-17T03:19
at 2010-04-17T03:19
By Sarah
at 2010-04-18T05:06
at 2010-04-18T05:06
By Thomas
at 2010-04-21T20:33
at 2010-04-21T20:33
By Margaret
at 2010-04-22T00:17
at 2010-04-22T00:17
By Callum
at 2010-04-26T14:30
at 2010-04-26T14:30
By Andrew
at 2010-05-01T05:23
at 2010-05-01T05:23
By Mary
at 2010-05-05T03:26
at 2010-05-05T03:26
By Margaret
at 2010-05-08T02:19
at 2010-05-08T02:19
By Andrew
at 2010-05-08T12:07
at 2010-05-08T12:07
By Ophelia
at 2010-05-13T03:05
at 2010-05-13T03:05
By Yedda
at 2010-05-15T01:01
at 2010-05-15T01:01
By Hazel
at 2010-05-17T22:37
at 2010-05-17T22:37
By Franklin
at 2010-05-18T01:57
at 2010-05-18T01:57
By Selena
at 2010-05-21T00:41
at 2010-05-21T00:41
By Doris
at 2010-05-22T18:10
at 2010-05-22T18:10
By Olive
at 2010-05-23T06:20
at 2010-05-23T06:20
By Rae
at 2010-05-24T07:46
at 2010-05-24T07:46
By Dora
at 2010-05-24T14:00
at 2010-05-24T14:00
Related Posts
我所知的考績法受害個案
By Robert
at 2010-03-12T16:06
at 2010-03-12T16:06
我所知的考績法受害個案
By Charlie
at 2010-03-12T15:59
at 2010-03-12T15:59
我所知的考績法受害個案
By Emma
at 2010-03-12T11:53
at 2010-03-12T11:53
考績拿丙等 張哲琛:後功應可抵前過
By Eartha
at 2010-03-12T09:06
at 2010-03-12T09:06
有關北縣府幾問
By Skylar Davis
at 2010-03-12T01:07
at 2010-03-12T01:07