丙的趴數 - 考績
By Andy
at 2010-03-25T00:54
at 2010-03-25T00:54
Table of Contents
個人認為丙等3趴這條是弄不掉的
現在搞了個10年 一優三甲抵丙
繼續對這條死纏爛打下去 又會被惡質媒體 惡質人士(王姓議員 神豬等)扣一堆帽子
啥放水啦 得了便宜又賣乖啦 假改革啦
其實現在應該要爭二甲才能升等 還有乙等暫停晉級 甲等比例65%的問題
那幾條應該爭取維持現制不變 甲至少維持75%
這幾部份都被3%而忽略掉了 不過對大部份現職人員來說 影響最大的是這幾條
p.s.另外 我認為不用繼續幫王姓議員炒作 這只是在幫她打知名度
她又不是立委 無法決定什麼事
年底記得幫她反輔選就好 松山信義很多老將新人要出來的 科科
慧珠姐好像要在這區復出
※ 編輯: jcll 來自: 124.11.16.232 (03/25 01:03)
推 nightwing: 頭都剃了一半 能中途喊停嘛??118.232.107.152 03/25 00:55
→ nightwing: 結論就是 考績法越修越慘 博改革美名118.232.107.152 03/25 00:56
推 howenchong:YES 114.33.123.207 03/25 01:03
推 shiva999:(((((強烈反對"提高約聘僱人員的比例")))220.141.117.211 03/25 01:46
→ shiva999: ((強烈反對"考績等次".以"比率"規定之)220.141.117.211 03/25 01:46
推 twsakura:若這條通過 可預見許多民間企業將會引用 211.74.92.51 03/25 01:47
→ shiva999:個人認為"考績等次"一定不能用"比率"來規220.141.117.211 03/25 01:47
→ shiva999:定.因為若是規定了.會被有心人士用來"清220.141.117.211 03/25 01:48
→ twsakura:且條件只會比公家更嚴苛 反正被罵是政府 211.74.92.51 03/25 01:49
→ shiva999:除異己.公務人員將無法堅持"行政中立".這220.141.117.211 03/25 01:50
→ shiva999:將會是一個"沒有正義的公務體系".220.141.117.211 03/25 01:51
→ shiva999:不管是甲等.還是乙等.都不能規定比率220.141.117.211 03/25 01:53
→ shiva999:大家要繼續加油~反對所有"不公"的制度220.141.117.211 03/25 01:55
推 airlow:沒錯,除非砍掉重練,不然只會越改越慘 163.22.160.104 03/25 09:30
→ airlow:要修正錯誤就只能用更大錯誤去補 163.22.160.104 03/25 09:30
→ airlow:一個本質上腦殘的政策,本質不改,再怎麼修 163.22.160.104 03/25 09:31
→ airlow:都還是腦殘 163.22.160.104 03/25 09:31
Tags:
考績
All Comments
By Regina
at 2010-03-27T12:43
at 2010-03-27T12:43
By Skylar Davis
at 2010-04-01T09:20
at 2010-04-01T09:20
By Kyle
at 2010-04-04T05:38
at 2010-04-04T05:38
By Ula
at 2010-04-05T14:59
at 2010-04-05T14:59
By Gary
at 2010-04-08T23:23
at 2010-04-08T23:23
By Liam
at 2010-04-12T13:40
at 2010-04-12T13:40
By Kumar
at 2010-04-15T06:44
at 2010-04-15T06:44
By Odelette
at 2010-04-17T01:02
at 2010-04-17T01:02
By Blanche
at 2010-04-17T21:42
at 2010-04-17T21:42
By Hedy
at 2010-04-20T18:12
at 2010-04-20T18:12
By Dora
at 2010-04-23T14:55
at 2010-04-23T14:55
By Enid
at 2010-04-23T19:30
at 2010-04-23T19:30
By Kelly
at 2010-04-24T16:38
at 2010-04-24T16:38
By Ethan
at 2010-04-26T18:41
at 2010-04-26T18:41
Related Posts
深度論述?
By Frederica
at 2010-03-24T23:59
at 2010-03-24T23:59
台北施政滿意度那麼低 為什麼打不出丙等
By Kelly
at 2010-03-24T23:43
at 2010-03-24T23:43
Re: 如果考績法通過,會是如何的景象
By Zenobia
at 2010-03-24T23:42
at 2010-03-24T23:42
新修法裡的九之一
By Kyle
at 2010-03-24T23:34
at 2010-03-24T23:34
Re: 如果考績法通過,會是如何的景象
By Catherine
at 2010-03-24T22:53
at 2010-03-24T22:53