考績法爭議大家要注意了 - 考試
By Zanna
at 2010-03-12T21:21
at 2010-03-12T21:21
Table of Contents
如同前面有板友說的其中最最重要的，就是取消一甲二乙升等，和75%降到65%這兩個
制度變更,強制3%丙等這種太激進的做法我個人覺得到最後通過的機會反而不大,因為
爭議大大了,不見得能獲得社會大眾的正面反應,反而得罪了一票公務員
在現在馬政府惜票如金的態度下應該會斟酌再議
萬一考試院趁著大家把焦點放在3%丙等上面而偷渡升等標準跟甲等比例,這一個反而影
響大家的權益最多,每年多10%的機機率得不到甲等,升等的機率降低更多,所以抗議的
目標不能只是3%的丙等而是整部考基法
還要麻煩大家想想什麼理由說服立委不要通過取消一甲二乙升等，和75%降到65%這兩個
東西
--
All Comments
By Delia
at 2010-03-14T23:01
at 2010-03-14T23:01
By Hedwig
at 2010-03-16T02:55
at 2010-03-16T02:55
By Zenobia
at 2010-03-17T06:05
at 2010-03-17T06:05
By Todd Johnson
at 2010-03-20T16:36
at 2010-03-20T16:36
By Damian
at 2010-03-25T09:40
at 2010-03-25T09:40
By Eartha
at 2010-03-30T06:47
at 2010-03-30T06:47
By Queena
at 2010-04-02T10:42
at 2010-04-02T10:42
By Una
at 2010-04-06T15:00
at 2010-04-06T15:00
By Selena
at 2010-04-06T16:10
at 2010-04-06T16:10
By Valerie
at 2010-04-11T05:56
at 2010-04-11T05:56
By Elma
at 2010-04-12T02:22
at 2010-04-12T02:22
By Daph Bay
at 2010-04-15T18:03
at 2010-04-15T18:03
By Yedda
at 2010-04-17T20:35
at 2010-04-17T20:35
By Gilbert
at 2010-04-20T03:58
at 2010-04-20T03:58
By Oliver
at 2010-04-23T21:32
at 2010-04-23T21:32
By Barb Cronin
at 2010-04-28T09:12
at 2010-04-28T09:12
By Freda
at 2010-04-29T11:16
at 2010-04-29T11:16
By Gary
at 2010-04-29T18:52
at 2010-04-29T18:52
By Kelly
at 2010-05-02T14:33
at 2010-05-02T14:33
By Margaret
at 2010-05-05T05:44
at 2010-05-05T05:44
By Ophelia
at 2010-05-07T10:15
at 2010-05-07T10:15
By Ophelia
at 2010-05-07T13:19
at 2010-05-07T13:19
By Enid
at 2010-05-08T11:23
at 2010-05-08T11:23
By Daniel
at 2010-05-10T16:06
at 2010-05-10T16:06
Related Posts
公務員是否應表態聲援私校教師?
By Jacob
at 2010-03-12T20:07
at 2010-03-12T20:07
銓敘部澄清係主動向府院高層簡報考績法修正規劃方向及內容
By Steve
at 2010-03-12T18:28
at 2010-03-12T18:28
北市地特四等一般行政志願選填問題
By Sierra Rose
at 2010-03-12T17:34
at 2010-03-12T17:34
我所知的考績法受害個案
By Rae
at 2010-03-12T16:06
at 2010-03-12T16:06
我所知的考績法受害個案
By Genevieve
at 2010-03-12T15:59
at 2010-03-12T15:59