強制比例仍在,我們不要被轉移焦點 - 考試
By Leila
at 2010-03-24T19:45
at 2010-03-24T19:45
Table of Contents
現今無效的考績與淘汰制度無法制衡那些爛的公務員的原因
都是因為那些人有關係有後台
而那是誰造成的
大部分還不是因為那些民代造成
今天考試院的作法本末倒置
沒有辦法訂出有效的做法也不要訂出一個更爛的
加害原先的受害者....
棺大老爺原先的盤算大概是每年都有新人
餵新人吃餅影響不了太多選票 順便深化對公務人員的控制
想說騙一點中間選民
但是說真的中間選民很容易受到影響 你政績爛做什麼都搶不到票
可是對公務員來說你改個考績法
我做的要死要活 換來吃餅我大概一輩子也不會支持你吧...
※ 引述《bookshop (哈)》之銘言:
: 媒體都大幅報導所謂考績法改革大轉彎
: 但事實上強制比例丙等仍在
: 所謂十年內再拿三甲或優等根本不可能
: 或者十年內無三丙則不列入日後的累計
: 都只是花招而已
: 只要有一個丙,公務員往後要請調要升遷根本無望
: 大家不要中了考試院的緩兵之計
--
All Comments
By Hedda
at 2010-03-28T08:18
at 2010-03-28T08:18
By Daniel
at 2010-03-31T07:01
at 2010-03-31T07:01
By Ursula
at 2010-04-02T19:14
at 2010-04-02T19:14
By Anthony
at 2010-04-02T23:09
at 2010-04-02T23:09
By Agnes
at 2010-04-05T04:05
at 2010-04-05T04:05
By Ursula
at 2010-04-09T01:22
at 2010-04-09T01:22
By Tristan Cohan
at 2010-04-12T18:02
at 2010-04-12T18:02
By Agnes
at 2010-04-12T21:19
at 2010-04-12T21:19
By Zora
at 2010-04-15T22:20
at 2010-04-15T22:20
By Mary
at 2010-04-17T18:08
at 2010-04-17T18:08
By Selena
at 2010-04-20T18:03
at 2010-04-20T18:03
By Agatha
at 2010-04-25T06:08
at 2010-04-25T06:08
By Franklin
at 2010-04-28T23:14
at 2010-04-28T23:14
By Bethany
at 2010-05-01T12:52
at 2010-05-01T12:52
By Sarah
at 2010-05-05T18:32
at 2010-05-05T18:32
By Frederica
at 2010-05-07T14:40
at 2010-05-07T14:40
Related Posts
連三甲抵一丙VS兩甲升職等
By Rosalind
at 2010-03-24T19:16
at 2010-03-24T19:16
施政滿意度低 公務人員的錯!!
By Tom
at 2010-03-24T19:09
at 2010-03-24T19:09
教育部公協會 就甘心~~
By Vanessa
at 2010-03-24T18:33
at 2010-03-24T18:33
吳泰成:試辦1%丙等都難
By Steve
at 2010-03-24T18:21
at 2010-03-24T18:21
有人在林益世委員部落格發表這個評論...
By Callum
at 2010-03-24T18:05
at 2010-03-24T18:05