為何關於「公務員考績丙等不得低於3%」措施不適用軍教人員? - 考試
By Olga
at 2010-03-06T12:17
at 2010-03-06T12:17
Table of Contents
為何關於「公務員考績 丙等不得低於3%」措施不適用在軍教人員?
公務員為什麼總是成為被修理的對象?為何不是一體適用?
看到最近一連串考試院改革的作法,實在令人心寒!早知道當時報考大學
志願填師範學院(公費),當國小老師就好了!或者是大學畢業直接去服志願役,從
少尉當起,月薪也從5萬起跳!真不曉得怎麼會笨到當這種沒有尊嚴的公務員?
要論薪水,公務員是軍公教中最少者,被打乙等考績比例也是最高者,怎麼當公務
員這麼委屈呢?
那些有關改革考績的作法,也許會讓一般民眾覺得政府很有魄力,姑且不論是否
合理,至少把軍教人員排除在外,就顯得很沒有說服力!軍教人員長期不用繳稅,
即使到今天健保費漲,大企業優惠刪除,他們還是一樣不用繳稅,已經是非常過分
!而今天口口聲聲說要改革,又把軍教人員排除在外,用意是什麼呢?為什麼
軍人和教師的考績就可以幾乎都打甲等,除非有嚴重失職才乙等,而公務員的
考績竟然要壓低到65%?請問正當性在哪裡?公務員真的表現差到都不如軍人和
教師嗎?為什麼不一體適用?他們不也是廣義的公務員嗎?
--
公務員為什麼總是成為被修理的對象?為何不是一體適用?
看到最近一連串考試院改革的作法,實在令人心寒!早知道當時報考大學
志願填師範學院(公費),當國小老師就好了!或者是大學畢業直接去服志願役,從
少尉當起,月薪也從5萬起跳!真不曉得怎麼會笨到當這種沒有尊嚴的公務員?
要論薪水,公務員是軍公教中最少者,被打乙等考績比例也是最高者,怎麼當公務
員這麼委屈呢?
那些有關改革考績的作法,也許會讓一般民眾覺得政府很有魄力,姑且不論是否
合理,至少把軍教人員排除在外,就顯得很沒有說服力!軍教人員長期不用繳稅,
即使到今天健保費漲,大企業優惠刪除,他們還是一樣不用繳稅,已經是非常過分
!而今天口口聲聲說要改革,又把軍教人員排除在外,用意是什麼呢?為什麼
軍人和教師的考績就可以幾乎都打甲等,除非有嚴重失職才乙等,而公務員的
考績竟然要壓低到65%?請問正當性在哪裡?公務員真的表現差到都不如軍人和
教師嗎?為什麼不一體適用?他們不也是廣義的公務員嗎?
--
All Comments
By Blanche
at 2010-03-08T03:05
at 2010-03-08T03:05
By Kristin
at 2010-03-12T00:35
at 2010-03-12T00:35
By Bennie
at 2010-03-14T17:24
at 2010-03-14T17:24
By Elvira
at 2010-03-18T13:30
at 2010-03-18T13:30
By Carol
at 2010-03-23T09:23
at 2010-03-23T09:23
By Irma
at 2010-03-24T07:01
at 2010-03-24T07:01
By Audriana
at 2010-03-25T13:47
at 2010-03-25T13:47
By Kumar
at 2010-03-29T09:04
at 2010-03-29T09:04
By Hazel
at 2010-03-29T17:26
at 2010-03-29T17:26
By Ina
at 2010-03-31T06:20
at 2010-03-31T06:20
By Skylar Davis
at 2010-04-04T23:44
at 2010-04-04T23:44
By Rosalind
at 2010-04-09T10:20
at 2010-04-09T10:20
By Quintina
at 2010-04-14T02:09
at 2010-04-14T02:09
By Kama
at 2010-04-14T11:13
at 2010-04-14T11:13
By Cara
at 2010-04-19T09:37
at 2010-04-19T09:37
By Vanessa
at 2010-04-24T04:06
at 2010-04-24T04:06
By Kumar
at 2010-04-28T02:37
at 2010-04-28T02:37
By Elma
at 2010-04-28T11:30
at 2010-04-28T11:30
By Anthony
at 2010-05-02T21:03
at 2010-05-02T21:03
By Isla
at 2010-05-07T00:52
at 2010-05-07T00:52
By Robert
at 2010-05-07T06:38
at 2010-05-07T06:38
By Blanche
at 2010-05-08T16:02
at 2010-05-08T16:02
By Dorothy
at 2010-05-10T10:42
at 2010-05-10T10:42
By Olive
at 2010-05-12T23:44
at 2010-05-12T23:44
By Wallis
at 2010-05-13T02:55
at 2010-05-13T02:55
By Yuri
at 2010-05-14T16:59
at 2010-05-14T16:59
By Lauren
at 2010-05-15T18:46
at 2010-05-15T18:46
By Puput
at 2010-05-20T14:19
at 2010-05-20T14:19
By Robert
at 2010-05-24T08:04
at 2010-05-24T08:04
By Eden
at 2010-05-27T07:43
at 2010-05-27T07:43
By Iris
at 2010-05-29T03:25
at 2010-05-29T03:25
By Hedda
at 2010-05-30T21:32
at 2010-05-30T21:32
By Elizabeth
at 2010-05-31T09:16
at 2010-05-31T09:16
By Dorothy
at 2010-06-04T17:34
at 2010-06-04T17:34
By Caitlin
at 2010-06-05T17:15
at 2010-06-05T17:15
By Todd Johnson
at 2010-06-08T03:09
at 2010-06-08T03:09
By Connor
at 2010-06-08T20:23
at 2010-06-08T20:23
By Christine
at 2010-06-11T01:34
at 2010-06-11T01:34
By Agnes
at 2010-06-16T00:07
at 2010-06-16T00:07
By Andrew
at 2010-06-18T18:36
at 2010-06-18T18:36
By Yuri
at 2010-06-19T16:52
at 2010-06-19T16:52
By Yedda
at 2010-06-23T06:33
at 2010-06-23T06:33
By Belly
at 2010-06-26T22:15
at 2010-06-26T22:15
By Odelette
at 2010-07-01T02:11
at 2010-07-01T02:11
Related Posts
[國際] 畢業後最能賺 史丹福排第5
By Ethan
at 2010-03-06T11:59
at 2010-03-06T11:59
[國際] 畢業後最能賺 史丹福排第5
By Iris
at 2010-03-06T11:07
at 2010-03-06T11:07
國考強迫孕婦入闈
By Elvira
at 2010-03-06T09:30
at 2010-03-06T09:30
銓敘部最新說明
By Hedy
at 2010-03-06T09:12
at 2010-03-06T09:12
Re: 新考績法對各種職系的影響
By Gary
at 2010-03-06T08:34
at 2010-03-06T08:34